THURSDAY, Aug. 27 (HealthDay News) — Would a gruesome picture of a cancer-ravaged mouth with rotting teeth make you think twice about buying a pack of cigarettes?
That’s the goal of new federal regulations expected to go into effect within three years. The rules will require tobacco companies to cover at least half of the front and back of packages with graphic — and possibly gruesome — images illustrating the dangers of smoking.
If U.S. regulations are modeled after those already in place in Canada and other countries, the warnings will be shocking: blackened lungs, gangrenous feet, bleeding brains and people breathing through tracheotomies.
Though hard to look at, the more graphic the image, the more effective in discouraging smoking, said Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco and director of the university’s Center for Tobacco Control, Research and Education.
“The graphic warnings really work,” Glantz said. “They substantially increase the likelihood someone will quit smoking. They substantially decrease the chances a kid will smoke. And they really screw up the ability of the tobacco industry to use the packaging as a marketing tool.”
Over the last decade, countries as varied as Canada, Australia, Chile, Brazil, Iran and Singapore, among others, have adopted graphic warnings on tobacco products. Some are downright disturbing: in Brazil, cigarette packages come with pictures of dead babies and a gangrened foot with blackened toes.
In the United States, the authority to force packaging changes was granted on June 22, when President Barack Obama, who has struggled with cigarette addiction since he was a teen, signed into law the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The landmark legislation gives the U.S. Food and Drug Administration broad new authority to regulate the marketing of tobacco products.
Under the law, the FDA has two years to issue specifics about the new graphic warnings tobacco products will be required to carry. Tobacco companies then have 18 months to get them onto packages.
Currently, the United States has some of the weakest requirements for cigarette package warnings in the world, said David Hammond, an assistant professor in the department of health studies at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. The text-only warnings on packages have changed little since 1984.
“Consumers in many Third World countries are getting more and better information about the risks of cigarettes off their packs,” Hammond said.
With much at stake for tobacco companies, there will be much wrangling over the details, Glantz said.
Yet research shows the FDA shouldn’t compromise, Glantz said. The more frightening the image, the greater the anti-smoking effect, he said.
Despite some research that has suggested images that are too stomach-turning may backfire because people eventually ignore them, new research is showing the most graphic images pack the most punch, said Jeremy Kees, an assistant professor of marketing at Villanova University.
In a yet-to-be published study, Kees had 541 adult smokers in the United States and Canada view a mild image of a smoker’s mouth with yellowed teeth; a moderately graphic image of a diseased mouth; and a third photo of a grotesque, disfigured mouth.
The most disturbing photo evoked the most fear, prompting more smokers to say they intended to quit, Kees said.
While the new regulations may also include no-nonsense, text warnings such as “Smoking Makes You Impotent” and “Smoking Kills,” the images will have the broadest reach, Hammond said.
Non-English speakers can understand the picture of a diseased mouth, as can people who are illiterate. Smokers tend to have lower literacy levels, Hammond noted.
And kids will get the message too, potentially stopping them from ever lighting up. “You have 4-year-olds and 5-year-olds who can understand that picture,” Hammond said.
Elsewhere, graphic warnings seem to be helping to drive down smoking rates. In Canada, about 13 percent of the population smokes daily, a 5 percent drop since the graphic warnings were adopted in 2000, Hammond said.
About 21 percent of the U.S. population smokes daily, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
While powerful, the gruesome warnings won’t get everyone to quit.
“Nicotine is highly addictive,” Hammond said. “Health warnings are not a magic bullet, but they help move people closer to quitting and provide a constant reminder of why many people want to change.”
More information
The Tobacco Labelling Resource Centre has images of cigarette packages from around the world.
By Jennifer Thomas
HealthDay Reporter
SOURCES: Jeremy Kees, Ph.D., M.B.A., assistant professor, marketing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pa.; David Hammond, Ph.D., assistant professor, department of health studies, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Stanton Glantz, Ph.D., professor, medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Last Updated: Aug. 27, 2009
Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Related Links:
![]()






Comments (8)
Coming from a former smoker, I think that is an awesome idea. Not only will it scare some sense into some people, but maybe it will deter regular smokers from buying packs as often out of sheer annoyance.
We already have these kinds of graphic images for unhealthy eating (sometimes they’re standing in line with us), so why not show the reality of smoking on cigarette packs as well?
Coming from a smoker, adding pictures won’t mean anything to me. I mean come on; we are all adults smoking here. (At least we are supposed to be) We know the side effects and we just choose to be tobacco addicts. No offence, but I’ve seen plenty of PETA ads out here in California and NOTHING could tear me away from a medium-rare T-bone. It’s only my opinion though.
nice one Ali, i definetly agree with you lol. Went to Singapore’s airport those images didnt even disgust me as a 11yr old girl (it was 3yrs ago) how would they have any impacts on my parents =3= and those graphics werent just yello teeth…
oh, and i LOVE your example ’bout PETA and your bond with med rare T-bone
smoking is an extremely bad habit.
so, how do you blog?
When travelling to Canada, I found the images to be amusing, but they did not deter me from purchasing packs.
Another thing that I found to be very odd was that Canadian stores were not allowed to display any of the cigarette packs – you had to buy cigarettes by using the specific name.
Looks like gradually we will all have to quit whether we choose to or not.
If you are buying cigarettes, you dont care about what happens to you. however, if you want to put stuff on the packaging, then why dont they just put a POISION label with a skull and cross bones? That has the same effect, and its known internationally.
I think this post should be more interesting.plz include some more information give me
That’s the goal of new federal regulations expected to go into effect within three years. The rules will require tobacco companies to cover at least half of the front and back of packages with graphic and possibly gruesome images illustrating the dangers of smoking.
http://ezinearticles.com/?Acai-Elite-Extreme-Review—Does-it-Work?&id=3435140