THURSDAY, July 17, 2008 — If you think that breast self-exams are a waste of time, I’m not surprised. A recent study created a deluge of publicity after it found that women taught to do breast self-exams didn’t cut their chances of dying of breast cancer. In fact, the study concluded that self-exams might even be a burden on the medical system because they result in more biopsies and tests to check out perfectly harmless lumps and bumps.
It would be a relief and a natural reaction to think, Thank you! That’s one more thing I can cross off my to-do list!
But hold on: Some experts advise otherwise for many women.
Studies conducted in China and Russia
First of all, does the new analysis, published in The Cochrane Library, even apply to American women? Jan Peter Kosters, PhD, and a colleague merged data from two studies, conducted in 2002 and 1999, which included 388,535 women—one group from Shanghai, China, and one from Russia. In both, factory workers were trained to do breast self-exams.
Women in China were no more likely to detect a cancer, and no less likely to die of breast cancer, than women who did not receive breast self-exam training. The women in Russia were 24% more likely to find a cancer, but no less likely to die of the disease, than their untrained peers.
Now it’s logical to ask if less-than-stellar medical treatment in Russia and China could explain why self-exams didn’t cut breast-cancer mortality (breast-cancer patients in the U.S. have the highest survival rate anywhere in the world). But David B. Thomas, MD, the epidemiologist at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle as well as the lead author of the 2002 Shanghai trial, tells me that the women actually had pretty good breast-cancer treatment.
No, the more important message is this: Dr. Thomas cautions women not to pull a personal lesson from a public-health study. Statistics that guide public-policy decisions are not necessarily relevant for you or me.
What it means for public health and what it means for you
You see, Dr. Thomas and colleagues set out (in the 2002 study) to determine if breast self-exams could take the place of mammograms in a group of women who didn’t have access to them.
“What we found was that trying to teach women in the general population to perform breast self-examination didn’t influence their risk of dying of breast cancer,” he tells me. Part of the reason was that they—like me and lots of women in the U.S. and around the world—weren’t motivated to do them consistently and correctly. (They did them at least every four to five months; it’s not clear if they did them once a month as recommended).
When experts talk about breast self-exams, they aren’t talking about a quick once-over in the shower whenever you think of it; they’re talking monthly. And they mean a detailed series of specific steps, including a diligent exam in both a standing and lying down position. A lot of women in the Shanghai trial just didn’t seem to stick with it.
The public-health implication for the general population is that teaching breast self-exams doesn’t cut breast-cancer mortality, and it’s crucial to have regular mammograms. However, for a highly motivated woman (one who does exams correctly and consistently because she’s concerned about breast cancer), the message could be quite different, according to Dr. Thomas.
“I wouldn’t ever tell a woman [of a certain age] not to practice breast self-exams,” he says. (For younger women in their teens, 20s, or even 30s, self-exams may not be worth it because the risk is so low in those without a family history, Dr. Thomas says.)
Self-exams are probably a good idea starting at around age 40 for women who are motivated to do them diligently, says Dr. Thomas. However, self-exams should be used to check for abnormalities between mammograms—not take the place of them.
If you do breast exams, you may undergo unnecessary tests
There is a risk here. If you conduct detailed examinations of your breasts, you will likely find lumps—and those lumps are likely to be benign. But a lump often leads to medical tests, including biopsies or expensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests.
This is a risk many women are willing to take, says Marisa Weiss, MD, the founder and president of Breastcancer.org.
“The reality is that in today’s world most women are willing to have a biopsy to prove that something is OK or find that it’s malignant, if in case it is,” says Dr. Weiss. “Individually, we women are willing to take a risk and so if you ask a woman, she’s not going to see that it’s harmful.”
Dr. Weiss was slightly exasperated by the new study’s conclusion that breast self-exams couldn’t be recommended but that “breast self-awareness” was important (self-awareness would include properly conducted self-exams, you’d think.)
“What in fact is breast awareness? What does that mean? How do I as a doctor advise my patient?” she asks. “Are we to say, ‘Oh great, don’t examine your breasts but be aware of them, and call me if your breast falls off?’”
The bottom line
The reality is that 15% to 20% of all breast cancers are picked up by a physical exam, either at a doctor’s office or by a woman herself, says. Dr. Weiss.
“Among these huge population studies, [breast self-examination] didn’t make a survivorship difference, but I can tell you that have I patients—plenty of them—who were the ones to find their breast cancer and it was found early and they are living and doing well,” she says. “You can say that’s individual and anecdotal, but it’s real.”
We’ve featured some of those women in Health.com stories about the self-exam issue. It’s impossible to know what percentage of women find cancer as a result of by-the-book breast self-examinations versus random “I-picked-it-up-in-the-shower” type of exams.
But it stands to reason that the more you know about your breasts and how to examine them, the more likely you are to detect changes, healthy or unhealthy. There are plenty of good online videos about proper self-exam techniques.
“I would say, don’t sit on your hands—use them,” says Dr. Weiss. “They’re convenient, they’re free; use them on a regular basis as one of the tools that could potentially detect breast cancer early—or possibly even save your life.”
(PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES)
Related Links:








Comments (5)
Great summary, thank you for sharing it with your readers.
Paul McGee at the American Cancer Society left a comment on my blog post about this issue (at http://www.pinkribbonreview.com) — as did a woman from the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation — both of their opinions are worth reading.
““I wouldn’t ever tell a woman [of a certain age] not to practice breast self-exams,” he says. (For younger women in their teens, 20s, or even 30s, self-exams may not be worth it because the risk is so low in those without a family history, Dr. Thomas says.)”
I am so FRUSTRATED I could scream! Even those who encouage self-exam JUST DON’T GET IT! Women in their twenties CAN get breast cancer. What in the WORLD does it hurt for them to learn to do a good check? And BELIEVE ME women in their 30’s can get it. My mother did at 38 — and there was NO FAMILY HISTORY at that time. Her mother got it, but not until that woman was in her 80’s, thirty years later.
If my mother hadn’t found that lump in time she would have died. Because she found it, she died 31 years later of soemthing entirely unrelated. SHE found the lump, and she DID save her own life.
IT HURTS NOTHING. DO THE BREAST EXAMS. Learn how to do it. Do it BEFORE YOU’RE THIRTY so YOU can spot what is different about YOUR breasts EARLY. Your doctor won’t know your body the way you do in this regard.
Lordy I don’t get it — WHY do all these experts feel they have to put “if’s, ands and buts” on something that is so completely non-invasive???
thanks for the comments. Why do they always evaluate breast cancer strategies on reduction of deaths? Maintaining a high quality of life while alive is important as well. I too see no harm in teaching self-examinations, whether or not they ultimately uncover a person’s breast cancer. Why not do both self-exams as well as other tests? To say not to do self-exams is absurd; I was screaming at my tv set when I heard reports to that effect on CNN, etc. Many do discover their breast cancer lumps this way, as others do via mammograms. If we are not going to provide funding for mammograms for persons under 40, we must provide alternatives. (And I’m saying this as an eight-year survivor whose breast cancer was discovered only via mammograms — but I had the luxury of being over 40 at the time.) We can and must encourage both self-exams and regular testing via mammograms and other related means.
Has anyone tried radiation free thermography to screen for breast cancer? My naturopath’s office offers this service once/twice per year, but I haven’t tried it.
I’d love more info from someone who’s tried it.
I agree that self exams are very important… a friend of mine is a breast cancer survivor… she’s in her early 30’s!
I have found a lump on my breast accidentally while I was in the shower. I then proceeded to have a self exam. Then i made an appointment to my ob-gyn and she referred me to a surgeon. All of this in a span of 3 weeks. Now they found a 0 stage ductal carcinoma in Situ, which is non invasive. But again the size is vast that she wanted to reopen and get also a biopsy on the right breast.
I am going through the procedure in a week time. I have confidence that my cancer, which was detected at a very early stage will be eradicated from my system