<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amy Winehouse&#8217;s Emphysema Startles Experts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.health.com/2008/06/24/pop-stars-emphysema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.health.com/2008/06/24/pop-stars-emphysema/</link>
	<description>Health, medical, and wellness news from Health.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://news.health.com/2008/06/24/pop-stars-emphysema/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthliving.wordpress.com/?p=1205#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>This doctor if he is infact is one has made a huge mistake or been misquoted. 97-98% is normal not 80%. She would be on oxygen at that low rate. Something is wrong with this story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doctor if he is infact is one has made a huge mistake or been misquoted. 97-98% is normal not 80%. She would be on oxygen at that low rate. Something is wrong with this story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allison r</title>
		<link>http://news.health.com/2008/06/24/pop-stars-emphysema/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>allison r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthliving.wordpress.com/?p=1205#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Is there anything worse than a *singer* being at 70% lung capacity? Terrible! Glad to get more details here though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything worse than a *singer* being at 70% lung capacity? Terrible! Glad to get more details here though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://news.health.com/2008/06/24/pop-stars-emphysema/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthliving.wordpress.com/?p=1205#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>Hopefully a few readers who share the same addictions will get the message.  Quit burning your lungs with crack and cigarettes or you could end up with emphysema at a very early age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully a few readers who share the same addictions will get the message.  Quit burning your lungs with crack and cigarettes or you could end up with emphysema at a very early age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
